<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheism, evolution and morals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/</link>
	<description>The Bloggery of Damian Peterson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 10:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Campbell</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/#comment-4453</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=153#comment-4453</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t believe you’re the type of person who values truth over ‘winning’ arguments.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(( :) Your &#039;Grant Dexter&#039; is my &#039;Heraclides&#039;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t believe you’re the type of person who values truth over ‘winning’ arguments.</p></blockquote>
<p>(( <img src='http://damian.peterson.net.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Your &#8216;Grant Dexter&#8217; is my &#8216;Heraclides&#8217;))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=153#comment-4445</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve indicated in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/15/how-polarisation-can-get-in-the-way-of-truth/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recent post&lt;/a&gt; I really think it futile for two people with such differing starting assumptions to try to come to a common understanding without a &lt;i&gt;huge&lt;/i&gt; amount of patience and courtesy.

I really just don&#039;t feel all that patient or courteous and I don&#039;t believe you&#039;re the type of person who values truth over &#039;winning&#039; arguments.

The best advice I can give you is to go talk to fellow Christians who happen to believe, first, that the earth is somewhat older than 6000 years and, if you find their evidence compelling, talk to a theistic evolutionist. Maybe then we&#039;d have enough of an overlap to even begin a dialogue.

I wish you all the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve indicated in a <a href="http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/15/how-polarisation-can-get-in-the-way-of-truth/" rel="nofollow">recent post</a> I really think it futile for two people with such differing starting assumptions to try to come to a common understanding without a <i>huge</i> amount of patience and courtesy.</p>
<p>I really just don&#8217;t feel all that patient or courteous and I don&#8217;t believe you&#8217;re the type of person who values truth over &#8216;winning&#8217; arguments.</p>
<p>The best advice I can give you is to go talk to fellow Christians who happen to believe, first, that the earth is somewhat older than 6000 years and, if you find their evidence compelling, talk to a theistic evolutionist. Maybe then we&#8217;d have enough of an overlap to even begin a dialogue.</p>
<p>I wish you all the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Dexter</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Dexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=153#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>So?

You&#039;re still making things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re still making things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/#comment-4389</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=153#comment-4389</guid>
		<description>...except that this was written as a direct response to a Christian who wanted to know how atheism and/or evolution are compatible with morality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;except that this was written as a direct response to a Christian who wanted to know how atheism and/or evolution are compatible with morality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Dexter</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/#comment-4386</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Dexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=153#comment-4386</guid>
		<description>You can tell, very quickly, that evolution is not science when its defenders get so easily caught up in morality debates. Nobody ever has morality debates over people who ascribe to a particular theory of gravity, but mention evolution and watch the hackles rise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can tell, very quickly, that evolution is not science when its defenders get so easily caught up in morality debates. Nobody ever has morality debates over people who ascribe to a particular theory of gravity, but mention evolution and watch the hackles rise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Campbell</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=153#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>HAHA! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA! <img src='http://damian.peterson.net.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=153#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>&quot;I used to be (OK still am!) quite a picker, myself, and would often get nose-bleeds… This would be one of many shades, hues and degrees of ‘wrongness’. It makes me an evil-dirty-nose-picker.&quot;

Too much information bro - take it to confession! : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I used to be (OK still am!) quite a picker, myself, and would often get nose-bleeds… This would be one of many shades, hues and degrees of ‘wrongness’. It makes me an evil-dirty-nose-picker.&#8221;</p>
<p>Too much information bro &#8211; take it to confession! : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Campbell</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=153#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jack,
My understanding of &#039;good/evil&#039; and &#039;right/wrong&#039; is very relational.  Relationships to others; relationship to creation/nature, relationship to self (and, surprise, surprise - relationship to God of course).

Things can be wrong for lots of different reasons.  Things that are &#039;right&#039; in most circumstances can be &#039;wrong&#039; in others.  And of course, I don&#039;t call people who engage in SGSS &#039;evil&#039;.  :)

I just think the behaviour is contrary to how our bodies are designed, and that seems logical whether you think we&#039;ve been designed by God+nothing, God+evolution, Evolution+god or evolution+Nothing...  And yes, I&#039;m well aware that your nose isn&#039;t &#039;designed&#039; to be picked either.  But again, the wrongness or rightness of &#039;nose-picking&#039; is tied up not only with the design of nose and of finger, but also with our relationship to others, self, etc., etc.  There ARE wrong ways to picketh the noseth.  I used to be (OK still am!) quite a picker, myself, and would often get nose-bleeds...  This would be one of many shades, hues and degrees of &#039;wrongness&#039;.  It makes me an evil-dirty-nose-picker.  But this is different from being an evil child pornographer.  And so it engaging in SGSS.  I think it&#039;s wrong - but wrong in a very different way to which other things are wrong.

Things aren&#039;t wrong &#039;just because they are dammit&#039;.  They&#039;re wrong in the sense of breaking relationship between other, self, creation/nature, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jack,<br />
My understanding of &#8216;good/evil&#8217; and &#8216;right/wrong&#8217; is very relational.  Relationships to others; relationship to creation/nature, relationship to self (and, surprise, surprise &#8211; relationship to God of course).</p>
<p>Things can be wrong for lots of different reasons.  Things that are &#8216;right&#8217; in most circumstances can be &#8216;wrong&#8217; in others.  And of course, I don&#8217;t call people who engage in SGSS &#8216;evil&#8217;.  <img src='http://damian.peterson.net.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I just think the behaviour is contrary to how our bodies are designed, and that seems logical whether you think we&#8217;ve been designed by God+nothing, God+evolution, Evolution+god or evolution+Nothing&#8230;  And yes, I&#8217;m well aware that your nose isn&#8217;t &#8216;designed&#8217; to be picked either.  But again, the wrongness or rightness of &#8216;nose-picking&#8217; is tied up not only with the design of nose and of finger, but also with our relationship to others, self, etc., etc.  There ARE wrong ways to picketh the noseth.  I used to be (OK still am!) quite a picker, myself, and would often get nose-bleeds&#8230;  This would be one of many shades, hues and degrees of &#8216;wrongness&#8217;.  It makes me an evil-dirty-nose-picker.  But this is different from being an evil child pornographer.  And so it engaging in SGSS.  I think it&#8217;s wrong &#8211; but wrong in a very different way to which other things are wrong.</p>
<p>Things aren&#8217;t wrong &#8216;just because they are dammit&#8217;.  They&#8217;re wrong in the sense of breaking relationship between other, self, creation/nature, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=153#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>&quot;it would be immensely helpful to have a selection of psychopathic identical twins&quot;

Anything for science eh! : )

Dale - how am I thinking about these things - well the word &#039;wrong&#039; seems to be the problem in that does it mean &#039;bad, evil, hurtful to others, immoral...?&#039; or something like &#039;not socially acceptable,&#039;or &#039;not correct/abnormal&#039; or &#039;an illness&#039;.  If my son picked his nose, I&#039;d say don&#039;t do that, you don&#039;t stick your finger in there, even if you do enjoy it.   If he just couldnt stop despite attempts to do so and just couldnt feel happy without frequent nose picking, and went about his nose picking in the privacy of his own room and always washed his hands afterwards and disposed of the bogies, and even if this behaviour was symptom of an underlying pyschological issue, at worst I would say he had some sort of problem/illness.  At no point would I say he had been immoral or evil.   So in many respects I&#039;d see SSGS in much the same way.  In saying that I appreciate that comparisions to sky diving and nose picking will fall short because when it comes to sexual connections, it seems there is a much greater psychological or spiritual impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it would be immensely helpful to have a selection of psychopathic identical twins&#8221;</p>
<p>Anything for science eh! : )</p>
<p>Dale &#8211; how am I thinking about these things &#8211; well the word &#8216;wrong&#8217; seems to be the problem in that does it mean &#8216;bad, evil, hurtful to others, immoral&#8230;?&#8217; or something like &#8216;not socially acceptable,&#8217;or &#8216;not correct/abnormal&#8217; or &#8216;an illness&#8217;.  If my son picked his nose, I&#8217;d say don&#8217;t do that, you don&#8217;t stick your finger in there, even if you do enjoy it.   If he just couldnt stop despite attempts to do so and just couldnt feel happy without frequent nose picking, and went about his nose picking in the privacy of his own room and always washed his hands afterwards and disposed of the bogies, and even if this behaviour was symptom of an underlying pyschological issue, at worst I would say he had some sort of problem/illness.  At no point would I say he had been immoral or evil.   So in many respects I&#8217;d see SSGS in much the same way.  In saying that I appreciate that comparisions to sky diving and nose picking will fall short because when it comes to sexual connections, it seems there is a much greater psychological or spiritual impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Campbell</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/07/01/atheism-evolution-and-morals/#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=153#comment-1410</guid>
		<description>On &quot;nature v. nurture&quot;:
Again, I think it&#039;s fairly undisputed that it&#039;s not either-or, but both-and.  And, again, my opinion is that whilst genetic and/or memetic influence on behaviour may be strong-as, it remains that we don&#039;t have to give in to these influences...

On &quot;psychopathic behaviour&quot;:
Would it help if this was narrowed down to specific specific psychopathic tendencies?

Also, on the &quot;not much you can do&quot; point by the criminologist, I reckon he/she is mostly right.  When it comes to humans developing self-control in their lives, their desire(will) to change is absolutely key.  You can&#039;t change someone&#039;s desire(will) by brute force or by yelling at them.  However, if they genuinely want to (in this case) &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; be a psychopath, then I think there IS much that can be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On &#8220;nature v. nurture&#8221;:<br />
Again, I think it&#8217;s fairly undisputed that it&#8217;s not either-or, but both-and.  And, again, my opinion is that whilst genetic and/or memetic influence on behaviour may be strong-as, it remains that we don&#8217;t have to give in to these influences&#8230;</p>
<p>On &#8220;psychopathic behaviour&#8221;:<br />
Would it help if this was narrowed down to specific specific psychopathic tendencies?</p>
<p>Also, on the &#8220;not much you can do&#8221; point by the criminologist, I reckon he/she is mostly right.  When it comes to humans developing self-control in their lives, their desire(will) to change is absolutely key.  You can&#8217;t change someone&#8217;s desire(will) by brute force or by yelling at them.  However, if they genuinely want to (in this case) <i>not</i> be a psychopath, then I think there IS much that can be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
