<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Masturbatory Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/</link>
	<description>The Bloggery of Damian Peterson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 10:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My mutant mitochondria and life on earth &#124; The Atavism</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/#comment-5933</link>
		<dc:creator>My mutant mitochondria and life on earth &#124; The Atavism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=226#comment-5933</guid>
		<description>[...] You should prob­a­bly go read his blog because it’s inter­est­ing and, frankly, he’s des­per­ate for the traf­fic. A while back Damian was think­ing about mito­chon­dria and what they can tell us about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You should prob­a­bly go read his blog because it’s inter­est­ing and, frankly, he’s des­per­ate for the traf­fic. A while back Damian was think­ing about mito­chon­dria and what they can tell us about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/#comment-5299</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=226#comment-5299</guid>
		<description>Thank you; it&#039;s a gift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you; it&#8217;s a gift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/#comment-5298</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=226#comment-5298</guid>
		<description>smart ass :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>smart ass <img src='http://damian.peterson.net.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/#comment-5296</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=226#comment-5296</guid>
		<description>I disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/#comment-5294</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=226#comment-5294</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ve nailed it. That&#039;s a great observation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ve nailed it. That&#8217;s a great observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/#comment-5291</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=226#comment-5291</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just had a thought.

A blog&#039;s popularity is largely down to the amount of conversation that occurs surrounding the topics it raises. If we think of blogs as little living creatures then they will almost inevitably tend toward controversial topics in order to stimulate conversation (i.e. the number of comments can be seen as one measure of &#039;fitness&#039;).

This might explain why we tend to see (or, at least, notice) more politically, religiously and scientifically controversial blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just had a thought.</p>
<p>A blog&#8217;s popularity is largely down to the amount of conversation that occurs surrounding the topics it raises. If we think of blogs as little living creatures then they will almost inevitably tend toward controversial topics in order to stimulate conversation (i.e. the number of comments can be seen as one measure of &#8216;fitness&#8217;).</p>
<p>This might explain why we tend to see (or, at least, notice) more politically, religiously and scientifically controversial blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/#comment-5025</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=226#comment-5025</guid>
		<description>Ken, let me throw some thoughts out and we&#039;ll see where they go.

Blogging can be a relatively combative form of dialogue... it doesn&#039;t take long for &quot;fights&quot; to develop and for people to be pushing back and forth strongly on their views.

I would say that a large number of people attracted to blogging are those who feel comfortable with and are willing to give time to that form of engagement.

My over generalised observation is that it is these people from all persuasions that dominate the blogging world. In terms of Christianity and politics, it tends to be those with a more &quot;conservative&quot; and &quot;right&quot; leaning political pursuasion that tend to be more willing to debate, argue and combat around their ideas. This isn&#039;t always the case, but I think that a cursory look around the blogosphere will reveal it.

Christians at the more liberal end of the political spectrum (as I believe liberal and conservative are being defined here) tend to be less willing to engage in debate and argument... they are generally more passive and get frustrated with such discussions.

It&#039;s an interesting discussion and as always the labels can cause many a headache since liberal in popular terminology denotes the left when the classical definition puts it &quot;right&quot; in the libertarian camp - where there are quite a number of Christian thinkers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, let me throw some thoughts out and we&#8217;ll see where they go.</p>
<p>Blogging can be a relatively combative form of dialogue&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t take long for &#8220;fights&#8221; to develop and for people to be pushing back and forth strongly on their views.</p>
<p>I would say that a large number of people attracted to blogging are those who feel comfortable with and are willing to give time to that form of engagement.</p>
<p>My over generalised observation is that it is these people from all persuasions that dominate the blogging world. In terms of Christianity and politics, it tends to be those with a more &#8220;conservative&#8221; and &#8220;right&#8221; leaning political pursuasion that tend to be more willing to debate, argue and combat around their ideas. This isn&#8217;t always the case, but I think that a cursory look around the blogosphere will reveal it.</p>
<p>Christians at the more liberal end of the political spectrum (as I believe liberal and conservative are being defined here) tend to be less willing to engage in debate and argument&#8230; they are generally more passive and get frustrated with such discussions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting discussion and as always the labels can cause many a headache since liberal in popular terminology denotes the left when the classical definition puts it &#8220;right&#8221; in the libertarian camp &#8211; where there are quite a number of Christian thinkers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/#comment-4885</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=226#comment-4885</guid>
		<description>*Bump* 

(I&#039;m also interested to hear Frank&#039;s thoughts on this in response to Ken&#039;s question).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Bump* </p>
<p>(I&#8217;m also interested to hear Frank&#8217;s thoughts on this in response to Ken&#8217;s question).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/#comment-4507</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=226#comment-4507</guid>
		<description>Hey Ken, just a quick comment to let you know I will get around to responding to this. I&#039;m on holiday and will be back on Monday. Till then my blogging is being relegated to simply maintaining The Humanitarian Chronicle and making sure it stays civil :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ken, just a quick comment to let you know I will get around to responding to this. I&#8217;m on holiday and will be back on Monday. Till then my blogging is being relegated to simply maintaining The Humanitarian Chronicle and making sure it stays civil <img src='http://damian.peterson.net.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/04/03/masturbatory-blogging/#comment-4277</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=226#comment-4277</guid>
		<description>Now the humour seems to have evaporated - a serious question for Frank.

Madeleine has mentioned her efforts at compiling a rating list of NZ Christian Blogs. Now, it seems to me that religious groups/individuals have been quite prolific in blogging. More so than secular ideological groups/individuals. Maybe that has something to do with a perceived need to proselytise.

Anyway, my observation is (and I might be quite wrong - correct me if I am): Most NZ Christian Blogs I come across appear to me to be politically/ideologically conservative (I won&#039;t use the left/right terminology because I think it has little meaning these days - if it ever did). Perhaps Frank&#039;s blogs are an exceptions (I judge them not to be politically conservative).

But, Frank. If my observation is correct why is that so? Surely there are far more liberal Christians out there than evidenced by the blogs? Why aren&#039;t they participating?

My earliest mature contact with Christianity was in the peace movement - initially with people like the Quakers but later (particularly during the Vietnam war) with liberal mainstream Christians. I always got on well with them - there was a unity of purpose there.

But I rarely see this form of Christianity represented in NZ blogs.

Maybe I am wrong. Maybe Madeleine needs to differentiate here list along the liberal/conservative divide?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the humour seems to have evaporated &#8211; a serious question for Frank.</p>
<p>Madeleine has mentioned her efforts at compiling a rating list of NZ Christian Blogs. Now, it seems to me that religious groups/individuals have been quite prolific in blogging. More so than secular ideological groups/individuals. Maybe that has something to do with a perceived need to proselytise.</p>
<p>Anyway, my observation is (and I might be quite wrong &#8211; correct me if I am): Most NZ Christian Blogs I come across appear to me to be politically/ideologically conservative (I won&#8217;t use the left/right terminology because I think it has little meaning these days &#8211; if it ever did). Perhaps Frank&#8217;s blogs are an exceptions (I judge them not to be politically conservative).</p>
<p>But, Frank. If my observation is correct why is that so? Surely there are far more liberal Christians out there than evidenced by the blogs? Why aren&#8217;t they participating?</p>
<p>My earliest mature contact with Christianity was in the peace movement &#8211; initially with people like the Quakers but later (particularly during the Vietnam war) with liberal mainstream Christians. I always got on well with them &#8211; there was a unity of purpose there.</p>
<p>But I rarely see this form of Christianity represented in NZ blogs.</p>
<p>Maybe I am wrong. Maybe Madeleine needs to differentiate here list along the liberal/conservative divide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
