<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogosphere observations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/05/21/blogosphere-observations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/05/21/blogosphere-observations/</link>
	<description>The Bloggery of Damian Peterson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 03:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AskAnAtheist.org</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/05/21/blogosphere-observations/#comment-5632</link>
		<dc:creator>AskAnAtheist.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=422#comment-5632</guid>
		<description>So true!  I wonder if there are any studies to bear this sort of thing out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true!  I wonder if there are any studies to bear this sort of thing out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/05/21/blogosphere-observations/#comment-5476</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=422#comment-5476</guid>
		<description>Hmm, from graph 1 I am either completely stable or completely unstable.
So it all boils down to graph 2 - am I 100% convinced I am stable (meaning I am completely unstable) or only 80% sure (meaning I&#039;m completely stable)?

Perhaps I shouldn&#039;t have looked at the graph before making my self-assessment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, from graph 1 I am either completely stable or completely unstable.<br />
So it all boils down to graph 2 &#8211; am I 100% convinced I am stable (meaning I am completely unstable) or only 80% sure (meaning I&#8217;m completely stable)?</p>
<p>Perhaps I shouldn&#8217;t have looked at the graph before making my self-assessment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david w</title>
		<link>http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2009/05/21/blogosphere-observations/#comment-5475</link>
		<dc:creator>david w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 01:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damian.peterson.net.nz/?p=422#comment-5475</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so going to tweet this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so going to tweet this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

